Gender Budgeting (GS paper 3 UPSC IAS mains )

 What is the issue?

  • Gender Budgeting is needed to incorporate gender commitments into fiscal commitments.
  • There are multiple challenges for doing gender budgeting in India, which needs to be addressed soon.

What is gender budgeting?

  • It is an approach that uses fiscal policy to promote gender equality by trying to translate gender commitments into fiscal commitments.
  • This is done through different processes, resources and institutional mechanisms.
  • In a multi-level governance structure, the political economy of gender budgeting encompasses both the fiscal and legal frameworks.
  • The interface between intergovernmental fiscal transfers and the institutions of multi-level governance also matters.

What is the legal framework in India?

  • In India, gender budgeting is not mandatory by law at any level of the federation.
  • The legal frameworks for gender budgeting can differ in unitary or federal states with multi-level governance.
  • The frameworks for gender budgeting in India are confined only to fiscal fiat, inclusive of taxation and public expenditure policies.
  • To a limited extent, it is regarding the intergovernmental fiscal transfers.
  • There is heterogeneity of stakeholders, from various stages of budget formulation to implementation at multiple levels of governance.

What is the importance?

  • One important aspect of gender budgeting is that it can eliminate the statistical invisibility of the ‘unpaid’ care economy.
  • The invisibility of unpaid care is a significant issue.
  • This was recognised as an issue by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD) through Systems of National Accounts (SNA) 1993.
  • Properly measuring the care economy requires investment in improving measurement through, for instance, ‘time-use surveys’.
  • Time-use surveys are conducted in India only in six states, though it is likely to be extended to all states.

When was gender budgeting introduced in India?

  • Gender budgeting was pioneered in India in the research of NIPFP in 2000-2001 with UN Women and the Ministry of Women And Child Development.
  • Starting in 2005-06, a “Statement of Gender Budgeting” was introduced in the budget documents by the Union government.
  • Today, the process of gender budgeting within the Union Finance Ministry starts with the ‘budget circular’.
  • This circular states that each ministry and department is required to undertake gender-based analysis of demand for grants within the analytical matrices.
  • These matrices have been prepared by NIPFP for gender budgeting.
  • Now, urgent policy reform is required to revive the gender budgeting secretariat.

What is the deviation?

  • Underestimation or overestimation of the budget is important in driving home the accountability of the government.
  • Higher Budget Estimates do not ensure higher spending.
  • There is significant deviation between Budget Estimates and Revised Estimates and Actuals in India.
  • The errors are high for different expenditure components of gender budgeting.
  • Linking gender budgeting to outcomes involves ‘public expenditure benefit incidence’ analysis across income quintiles.
  • It also involves the integration of gender budgets in outcome budgets.
  • In India, the mechanism of intergovernmental fiscal transfers plays a major role in providing states sufficient financial resources to carry out their expenditure assignments.

What is the formula?

  • A 2016 Levy Economics Institute paper devised a formula for tax devolution into which gender sensitivity could be incorporated for India.
  • It has suggested incorporating the child sex ratio (0-6 years) as a gender criterion in the fiscal transfers.
  • The results revealed that ‘engendering’ intergovernmental fiscal transfers improve progressivity.

What does the Finance Commission’s report reveal?

  • The 15th Finance Commission of India has submitted its interim report in November 2019.
  • The report has integrated the criteria ‘Total Fertility Rate’ (reciprocal) with 12.5% as a proxy for demographic performance of states.
  • It also states that better performance in reduction of TFR serves as an indicator for better outcomes in health as well as education.
  • Hence, this criterion also rewards States with better outcomes in those important sectors of human capital.
  • The 15th Financial Commission’s final report is due in October 2020.
  • One has to wait and see whether they design a conditional grant for strengthening gender budgeting at the state level.
  • Designing a conditional transfer (specific purpose grant) to strengthen gender budgeting can be directly linked to gender equality outcomes.

What is needed?

  • Incorporating a gender criterion in the tax-transfer formula is an ideal solution for ‘engendering’ intergovernmental fiscal transfers.
  • However, the effectiveness of such unconditional fiscal transfers on gender equality outcome depends on how a State prioritises and designs gender budgeting programmes for gender equality.


You may also like...